Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:37

Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
The “Extremely Unlikely” Finding That Changes How We See Mass Extinction - SciTechDaily
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Legion of 50 strong as Seahawks reveal Top 50 players in franchise history - Field Gulls
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why do men prefer low-maintanence women?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Google’s NotebookLM now lets you share your notebook — and AI podcasts — publicly - The Verge
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
'Cosmic miracle!' James Webb Space Telescope discovers the earliest galaxy ever seen - Yahoo
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
‘Squid Game’ Finale Recap, Season 3, Ep. 6: ‘Humans Are…’ - Vulture
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What are some things you do for your form of self-care?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.